Another post on Risk
Rafi, Yong, Ted, Nonk are banned from reading this post
PS: Even if you dont lend me your Lenovo anymore I dont care haha...
Hahahha... Apparently my last post continued... Risk is really risky game to play. Look at the state of the Project Room 2B. Now I think Risk is not a recommended game to be played among the hard-headed people. Haha... There is a massive psychological (and linguistical, to a large extent) warfare in the room after the Risk game. Hmm... Maybe it's just the composition of the players which are just wrong. Yong and Rafi are the serious ones. Nonk is the moody guy. Me and Ted are the clowns. 2 clowns meet 2 serious guys. Big fight. A moody guy who is actually dont want to play but choose to play. Bad mood. Big fight + bad mood = madness!
Even from the start I noticed that there is something wrong with the game. I mean look... Yong was playing stupid online game with his laptop n Nonk was making noise about unfairness of the game system, roll dice kind of game. Anyways, as the game went Yong kept telling the rest to finish him off coz he was sleepy. My foot lah! Once he got his huge reinforcement he was like so onst. Bah! I cant call that a psychoing strategy even if he said it afterwards! Haizz... Why cant God gives ability to read mind... (although that's gonna be even messier). But still if I saw (hopefully true) this was the scenario on Yong's mind. Initially he saw the arrangement on the board and beaten by me in Aussie. He lost his morale and did not feel like playing anymore. Then he seek refuge in his stupid game (feeling sorry for my choice of word...) and kept telling us to kill him. Wth?! He even still fresh now! And it's like 4 am now? Isn't it ridiculous? Oh well, maybe adrenaline rush but.. just not common sensical.
Anyways, the game turned very wildly at this moment. After he bunked himself in one of the Russian area, he planned major invasion on me haha... But suddenly we felt that we (me, Nonk, Yong.. by then Ted was reduced to Japan only) should screw Rafi out first. And on doing such killing most of me. Haha... I laughed at that (PS: Rafi said nothing! No one can deny that!) and immediately counting at how many guys I had to take out Rafi's main army in umh... Canada. So yeah, that was what we did. Yong wiped out most of my Asia (which was not defended well) but leaving Aussie so I got the 2 extra troops. Then he wiped out most of my army in North America leaving Greenland alone so I had the access to Rafi's main troops. Then Nonk wiped out Europe and leaving a state for backup gateway to Rafi's troops. And as a result, a major invasion. 38 vs 29 troops each. Just following probabilities lah! I won...
Ok... And here's where the 'fun' par began. Rafi
And after the heated debate between Yong and Rafi -the earlier denied that it was heated- the rest (Rafi moved out) moved to TV room where Ted (coz he finished playing for qt long time) already been. Me and Nonk initially came in peace (duh! fren fren mah?) then it was disrupte by Yong's coming to discuss about that interesting incident. Oh well, big debate happened after that. Quite brutal one as temper flared (whoa, big phrase!), interruptions flew and argument thrown. The main thing was that Nonk believed that everyone should not be pissed after the game (so have fun lorh!) while Yong believed that game should be played as if it was real life situation (ie so must play seriously). So Nonk thought that it would be better if there is a rule saying that there should not be obvious alliances, which I contested because there is a subjectivity element there (what is obvious and what is not?). Good thing is that both still okay-ed to my silly suggestion of a minute of no interruption rule. Even Ted joined the fray attempting to rephrase both side of arguments in simpler words. It's just mad haha. I even covered my mouth upon speaking.
The argument was neverending one. Even till now, 5am, it is still not resolved. Yong was just too defiant and Nonk could not get Yong's view. I do not fully agree with both points but I could respect both. So yeah, for Ted's, Nonk's n my side I think all is cleared. As I said earlier, fren fren mah? Why angry coz of this thing. And we talked to clear this. So yeah, just need to see how Yong and Rafi today. I dunno about Rafi, just could not connect. When we played (real played as in making fun of everyone) he was mad and refused to play. So it is like strike two hahahhaha... Is it strike three and out or strike two and out? Haha...
Okay, I have to admit that I was a bit aggressive on using my loud voice to 'moderate' the debate . And talking about the debate I've just learned that Nonk quitted debate coz he does not like the fact that debate would yield in nothing. And besides that I understand that I made some mistakes. One, I was too erratic in play, sometimes with strategy sometimes with madness. Two, I lost it when Yong destroyed (which I believed to be accidental) my arrangement of pieces. Three, I lost it (again...) when Ted messed up with the game. So yeah, think I set the mood a bit bad as well.
I brought this up to Ted. That did not like his entertaining style. He entertained others by jacking someone (as always...). During the course of the game, he nuked some pieces by using rubber bands, hid a few of Nonk's pieces, putting in 'rebel' forces in his land etc etc. While I was not targetted, I did not like that he continuously disrupted the game. And the fact that he kept jacking a target (did he not think about the guy's feeling?). Oh well, maybe just my style is different. To entertain, I would jack myself and that's why Ted sometimes unconsciously picked me a few times as the target.... Like when he told the 'I never kiss a guy' thing a few times and I jumped 5 times while screaming 'one, two...' For those who dont understand, it's truth or truth with doing that as the punishment for those who cannot say 'no'.
And all these bring me into a thought... Are all games to be played to win or to have fun. One thing to take note is that when you keep winning, it is going to be fun. But does the maxim 'play to win' hold true in all cases? Obviously I could not answer using absolute yes or no. But this is my foolish stand. I play to win. But I would make fun of myself on the course. Justification of my stand: 'play to win'... of course lah, there is such thing called 'objective' of the game. Why play if dont want to fulfil the objectives? 'make fun' I think game was created so that the player could have some fun. Of course must ngebanyol a little bit rite? I'm not the kind of guy who is having fun by playing it seriously all the time. 'of myself' Hmm... I rather have the pain of being laughed so that others would not suffer. But I dont know whether this is the best way to initiate fun. For this I would see how different situations can shape my stand.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Lighter note! I kena inverted by Jeremiah again. haha. Fun but this time hurt lah. Could not balance myself so I fell forward. Luckily I tucked my head inwards and rolled on my left shoulder, so only my left knee suffered from minor abrasion. And that was during the clearing up of NUSSU dungeon. I got 6 pieces of T-shirt. So Cit, you can have one for your dance practices. Remind me haha. Umh, did not manage to get James' order of weird stuff like parfume and stuff. But nevermind got backup. Give him a T-shirt n Singtel book would suffice haha.
1 comment:
wawww...thanks for the t-shirt :):)
i'll remind u...hehehhee..
Post a Comment